Fatores determinantes de desvios no consenso estratégico da justiça do trabalho: uma análise da aderência dos planejamentos estratégicos dos tribunais regionais ao plano de âmbito nacional

Abstract

A recent trend toward improvement of administrative management in Public Potency, the Judiciary has gone through a significant reform in its structure and form of management with a view to implement typical techniques of governance, aimed at efficiency, transparency and accountability. In this sense, were created boards of internal control of large scope (CNJ) and specifically to the structure of the CSJT. The planning process of Labor Justice is based on the guidelines and objectives fixed by the CNJ, where, then, adjusting such premises to the reality of special jurisdictions of labor, the CSJT elaborates the strategic planning of national scope with participation and representation of local courts and serving, therefore, to guide the development of strategic planning and the targets of the Regional Labor Court. This research had the general objective to verify for what reasons a strategic alignment and consensus does not happen between the Regional Labor Courts and the national CSJT plan. It was used for the study methodology, initially with bibliographical and documentary analysis in the search for elements of strategic deviation and the level of grip and alignment of the courts and, then, with the adoption of field research, through questionnaires applied to managers of Regional Labor Court, took the perception of these regarding the planning and strategic alignment. It was possible to identify that, among the strategic objective which has less adherence by the regional authorities, the reason points to the absence of communication of the reasons for this decision-making and exchange of information on the importance of these specific objectives. Also was verified that the CSJT uses of one objective little stimulant, as the most of Tribunals reach such goals easily and doesn’t implant a challenge with a view to improving the judicial. Was easy to see that, the mangers has full notion of the degree of strategic alignment of their respective courts and that, in parts, the absence of adhesion is due to discredit in some strategic objectives in respect to the primary purposes of Labor Law and the best judicial. Still it was verified that the level of adherence of the Courts does not depend on the region, the budget issue, the size of the court or regionality, since in the three largest Courts, mediums or little, notes maximum and minimum degree of adherence to strategic alignment. Another relevant verification was that the object of bigger adherence was the ones with major collection of control bodies. With that data is still possible to apply corrections and greater exchange of information between CSJT and Courts with a view to enabling bigger future adherence and, whit that, improve the achievement of strategic goals, with a view to making Labor Justice more efficient and effective.