Artigo de opinião: práticas de escritas e reescritas, o que mudou

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of the written production process of opinion articles, more specifically the remarkable progress made between the first and last version of the texts produced by students of higher education, during an extension course offered by UTFPR ,. The main difficulties that arise in relation to the production of this genre of discourse highlighted are. The objective is to understand what these difficulties are and to verify if there is evolution of cohesion, coherence, standard norm and the compositional characteristics of the opinion article genre from the first to the last version. The method of production and data analysis is qualitative descriptive, with eight texts from four students from the first period (2015/01), from the UTFPR - Câmpus Pato Branco course of the participants of the extension course "Oficina de leitura, escritura e reescritura de artigos de opinião". They used were as study material, two texts of each student, one consisting of the initial version, and the other in the final. Therefore, the objective is to detect if there was in the text between the first and the last version. The theoretical basis used for the analysis of the material consists of the following authors: Koch (1997, 2001), Bakhtin (2000, 2010), Vygotsky (1993, 2009), Faraco (2008), Fávero (2005) and Marcuschi among others. The results reveal that the main difficulty in relation to the production of the opinion article is related to the argumentation and, consequently, to the compositional characteristics of the genre. However, the methodology used in the Workshop and the collaboration of the teachers responsible for the project (notes, corrections, questions), there was a significant evolution of the texts.