Comparativo de plataformas no-code : uma avaliação da eficiência e curva de aprendizado de usuários não técnicos

Abstract

The growing demand for agile and accessible technological solutions has driven the adoption of no-code platforms, which enable the development of applications without traditional programming. This study investigates the usability of these tools in workplace contexts, considering aspects such as efficiency, ease of use, adaptability, and customization capabilities. The research was conducted through a literature review and an empirical study with 45 participants, who evaluated their experience using the Bubble.io and Webflow platforms, both oriented toward web-based development. The results indicated that no-code platforms offer good accessibility for users with limited programming experience, allowing the rapid creation of interfaces and the execution of simple tasks with relative autonomy. However, limitations related to interface fluidity, performance and advanced customization were observed and may negatively impact the experience of more experienced users or those with specific technical demands. Overall, the findings demonstrate that these tools are effective alternatives for low-complexity needs in corporate environments, particularly for prototyping, simple automations and web interface creation. It is concluded that no-code platforms expand access to software development, although more robust projects still require greater flexibility, stability, and scalability.