Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/39128| Título: | Comparative Analysis of Computational Fluid Dynamics Software for Aerodynamic Analysis of Airfoils |
| Autor(es): | Marques, Nathalia Sampaio Sant’Anna Moraes, Pedro Henrique Amaro de Souza, Gabriel Suchodolak de Silva, Raquel da Cunha Ribeiro da |
| Palavras-chave: | Comparative analysis Computational simulation Aerodynamic performance |
| Data do documento: | 10-Nov-2024 |
| Câmpus: | Guarapuava |
| Citação: | MARQUES, Nathalia Sampaio Sant’Anna; MORAES, Pedro Henrique Amaro de; SOUZA, Gabriel Suchodolak de; SILVA, Raquel da Cunha Ribeiro da. In: BRAZILIAN CONGRESS OF THERMAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 20., 2024, Foz do Iguaçu. Anais eletrônicos [...]. Foz do Iguaçu: ABCM, 2024. Disponível em: doi://10.26678/ABCM.ENCIT2024.CIT24-0572 (/proceedings/view/CIT24/0572). |
| Resumo: | The present work conducts a comparative analysis among computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software. AN-SYS and OpenFOAM are used for this comparative study, focusing on analyzing the drag and lift coefficients of the NACA 2412 airfoil. The study aims to evaluate aspects such as processing speed, quality of mesh refinement, and ease of use of the software. The simulations are conducted under external, turbulent, incompressible, and two-dimensional flow conditions, using air as an ideal Newtonian gas model. For the analysis, computational simulations are carried out in both ANSYS and OpenFOAM, using two-dimensional modeling of the airfoil. ANSYS is noted for its user-friendly interface and extensive features, while OpenFOAM is an open-source software. Each software package is subjected to specific and meticulously defined conditions, ensuring an accurate and unbiased comparison. The analysis provides a comprehensive and objective perspective, assisting in the selection of the most suitable software for various aerodynamic engineering applications, both in research and prototype development. The conclusions highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each software in terms of processing speed, quality of mesh refinement, and ease of use. This study offers valuable information for researchers and engineers in the field of aerodynamics, aiding in the informed choice of CFD software for their specific applications. |
| URI: | http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/39128 |
| Aparece nas coleções: | GP - Engenharia Mecânica |
Arquivos associados a este item:
| Arquivo | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| comparativeanalysiscomputationalairfoils.pdf | 1,94 MB | Adobe PDF |  Visualizar/Abrir |
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.