Planejamento de escrita em meio digital e analógico

Abstract

The present study analyzed, from the socio-theoretical approach for studies on textual genres, the process of producing gender-based argumentative planning (opinion article) in two distinct supports: digital, word processor "Word 2010", using keyboard, mouse and monitor e; in traditional holder, paper with ballpoint pen. The writing planning process and its relation with the final version of the texts were highlighted, but some implications were also evaluated between producing in each of the supports, when appropriate. In order to do so, the scientific methodology, of an interpretative nature that guided this work, was elaborated based on the assumptions of Deslandes (1992), Chizzotti (2006) and Minayo (1992). In order to participate in the research and to write in the two supports, 10 students of Portuguese Literature were selected because they are producers of texts that are already in Higher Education and have contact with the two technological strands analyzed here: analog and digital. With regard to the choice of the genre that was produced and its characterization, the work was based on the ethnographic sociorre-theoretical proposal: Swales (1990) and Bhatia (1993); socio-historical cultural sociorecretor: Miller (1992), Freedman (1994), Swales (1996) Bazerman (2006) and Devitt (2009); and communicative: Gülich (1970), Steger (1982), Bergmann (1995) and Berkenkotter (1995). As regards the studies on writing and reading in the supports investigated here, the basic work considered comes from the studies of Haas (1995), on the use of technology for the promotion of writing and the concepts on literacy / multiletramentos, supported by authors such as: Rojo (2013), Street (2012) and Kleiman (2014). The main result obtained with this research indicates that each of the supports investigated, the digital and the analogue, demands a specific strategy to plan and produce with quality the discursive genre, opinion article.